The extraction of N. lappaceum leaves was carried out
using the maceration method for 2 × 24 hours. Powder of N. lappaceum leaves
weighed as much as 500 g. The solvents used were 70% ethanol with a ratio of
1:10 on the first day and 1: 4 on the second day [13]. The first and second
macerates were evaporated using a rotary evaporator 30-40ºC and then evaporated
with a water bath to obtain thick extracts [14,15]. The extract and the yield
obtained were calculated. 50-gram ethanol extract of N. lappaceum leaves was
hydrolyzed with methanol: HCL 2 N (1: 1) as much as 250 ml, then refluxed at
1000C for 1 hour [16].
Making dichloromethane
fraction and ethyl acetate fraction
The ethanol extract, which has been hydrolyzed, is
then ± 100 ml of distilled water so that the ethanol extract can be dispersed
in aquabides to facilitate the distribution of compounds based on the
solubility that occurs during fractionation. Fractionation was carried out by
using 250 ml dichloromethane solvent (divided into 3 shuffles) in a separating
funnel and followed by fractionation using 250 ml ethyl acetate solvent
(divided into 3 shakes) [17, 18].
Identification of
flavonoids by thin layer chromatography (TLC)
Quercetin, ethanol extract of N. lappaceum leaves,
dichloromethane fraction, and ethyl acetate fraction were weighed 5 mg then
dissolved with p.a ethanol as much as 5 ml. Each sample and comparison
quercetin was then bottled on the cellulose plate and eluted with 30% glacial
acetic acid. Spots were observed under 366 nm UV light before and after ammonia
evaporation and were observed after spraying the sitroborate reagent and heated
in a 105 0C oven for 5 minutes, recording the results [19].
Making xanthine solution
100 ?g / ml
Pure xanthine is weighed as much as 100 mg, then
dissolved with a few drops of 0.01 N NaOH, then added phosphate buffer to 100
ml so that the concentration of 1000 ?g / ml is obtained. From xanthine 1000 µg
/ ml solution, 1 ml was taken, then added phosphate buffer to 10 ml so that a
concentration of 100 µg / ml was obtained.
Making 0.1 U / ml
xanthine oxidase solution
Xanthine oxidase is made at a concentration of 0.1-0.2
U / ml in fresh conditions (Anonim, 1994). 0.1 ml of xanthine oxidase was
dissolved in phosphate buffer pH 7.5 to 3.5 ml volume so that the concentration
of 0.1 U / ml was obtained.
Making test solutions
(Allopurinol, ethanol extract, dichloromethane
fraction, and ethyl acetate fraction)
The mother liquor is made using each sample weighed as
much as 10 mg then added DMSO as much as 5 drops and added aquabidestilata to a
volume of 10 ml (1000 ?g / ml). For allopurinol, the mother liquor is diluted
so that a concentration of 2.5 ?g / ml is produced; 5 ?g / ml; 7.5 ?g / ml; and
10 ?g / ml. Whereas for ethanol extract samples, dichloromethane fraction, and
ethyl acetate fraction, concentrations of 10 ?g / ml, 13 ?g / ml, 17 ?g / ml,
and 20 ?g / ml were made.
Determination of
xanthine oxidase activity
The 450 ?g / ml (xanthine) substrate (450 ?l) was
added with a mixture of 450 ?l xanthine oxidase 0.1 U / ml and 424 ?l phosphate
buffer pH 7.5. The speed of uric acid formation from xanthine was observed in
spectrophotometry at a wavelength (?) 295 nm from the 0th minute to the 5th
minute at 25ºC. The data obtained is in the form of a rate (? A295 / minute).
The method follows with several changes [20].
Determination of
inhibition of xanthine oxidase activity
The 450 ?g / ml (xanthine) substrate (450 ?l) was
added with a mixture of 450 ?l xanthine oxidase 0.1 U / ml and 424 ?l phosphate
buffer pH 7.5. Then added allopurinol 200 ?l at a concentration of 2.5 ?g / ml;
5 ?g / ml; 7.5 ?g / ml; and 10 ?g / ml. In the same way, it was also determined
the inhibition of xanthine oxidase activity by 200 ?l of the test solution
namely ethanol extract, dichloromethane fraction, and ethyl acetate fraction at
concentrations of 10 ?g / ml, 13 ?g / ml, 17 ?g / ml, and 20 ?g / ml. The rate
of uric acid formation was observed in spectrophotometry at wavelength (?) 295
nm from 0 minutes to 5 minutes at 25ºC. The data obtained is in the form of a
rate (? A295 / minute). The method follows with several changes (Figure 1).